New Info On Yellowstone Suggests "Super Eruption" Was Two Smaller Eruptions

Yellowstone volcano has long thought to have had a large super eruption over 2 million years ago, but new evidence is suggesting that while 2 million years ago Yellowstone DID erupt with a VEI 7 or 8 eruption, it was not as big as once thought, and was followed 6,000 years later by a smaller eruption. The result was an ash layer that appeared to be one layer but was actually two. This suggests that Yellowstone is NOT as powerful as once thought, but is more active.

The study revealed that the Island Park Caldera is actually much more active than previously thought, and the new information might assist scientists in better predicting an eruption from Yellowstone, given that the timeline has now changed. The last magmatic eruption in the Yellowstone caldera was some 70,000 years ago, and an episode of phreatic eruptions that created a 5km wide crater (now Yellowstone Lake). 

Scientists were using a new "Rock Clock" method to determine the ages of ash and rock layers within the Huckleberry Ridge, and were surprised at the data they found. The data suggests that Yellowstone's explosive eruptions were around 12 percent weaker than previously thought, but smaller eruptions are actually more numerous. The last eruptive activity of any kind in Yellowstone occurred somewhere around 1350BC (give or take around 200 years), and was limited to hydrothermal eruptions.

Knowing when, or how, Yellowstone might erupt in the future is one of volcanology's biggest challenges, given the impact an eruption from Yellowstone might have. But the new data seems to shrink the idea that Yellowstone is capable of a world-ending eruption (one thing I highly disagree with most scientists about is that any event on earth is capable of wiping out 'all life'... life did not simply get wiped out and reappear on the planet, there are always survivors). Indeed, the new data seems to suggest that Yellowstone is not capable of "blotting out the sun worldwide", but is still a very dangerous volcano to anyone within about 100KM.

This is good news for anyone who was worried that Yellowstone could be a 'world ender', and probably bad news for anyone who wants to scare people into doomsday nonsense for the tabloids. An eruption from Yellowstone today would likely be much weaker than previous eruptions, given that as far as anyone knows, no new magma has been introduced into the Yellowstone system for a very long time. Scientists theorize that the current magma chamber consists of partially cooled magma known as 'crystal mush', and any eruption would likely result from water flashing into steam when it seeps into hot rock (a phreatic eruption). These types of eruptions are short lived, and very rarely pose a threat outside of 1km, but anything is possible.

In any case, this new info will definitely be helpful to understanding further the history and potential of the Yellowstone caldera.

Alaska's Mt. Iliamna Volcano Rumbles Away

The heightened seismicity at Alaska's mt. Iliamna continues, and today the seismicity is stronger than it has been. At around 6am UTC seismicity increased and is ongoing at this time. This probably indicates further intrusion as the seismicity does appear to be harmonic tremor. Mt. Iliamna has not erupted in historical time, but the mountain displays vigorous fumeroles at the summit and flank. A previous visit by AVO scientists revealed heightened temperatures and gas emissions from the fumeroles, but they were quick to point out that the current unrest is similar to events in the 1990's when magma dike intrusion occurred, but did not lead to an eruption.

Live webicorder of Iliamna seismicity from AVO.

However the current unrest at the volcano is strong compared to previous events, and has now been underway for well over a month or so. It is my guess that intrusion is definitely taking place. Whether or not this actually leads to an eruption remains to be seen, but all the indicators are there.

Live image via AVO webcam of Mt. Iliamna

An eruption at Iliamna would most likely start off explosive, most likely phreatic eruptions. Phreatic eruptions occur when melt water comes into contact with a subterranean heat source like a magma chamber or very hot rock. This results in water flashing into steam and creating a steam driven explosion. Once this occurs, it can release pressure holding back the magma, and would likely enter a dome building phase. Of course, this is speculation because we've never seen the volcano erupt in historical time, and the structure of the volcano is highly eroded by glaciation.

Currently the visual indicators from Iliamna (via webcam) show nothing unusual, but as is the case for volcanoes that haven't recently erupted, this can change suddenly at any time. Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland experienced a couple hundred years of dormancy until seismicity increased, and began with a small fissure eruption, and then a main event that caused a widespread ash cloud to strand passengers in Europe for weeks on end, causing economic hardship in the Eurozone, not to mention a lot of frustration.

Due to Iliamna's location on a heavily trafficked air route, an eruption would cause some travel disruptions if an ash cloud was produced. However, there is no threat to any human population due to its remoteness but ashfall would likely occur in some towns near the area (including the area where the webcam is placed!). Alaskans are no stranger to ash covered homes and cars, as two volcanoes, Cleveland and Augustine frequently erupt and produce fine ash.

As it stands right now, there is no imminent risk of eruption, just heightened temperature and seismicity. You would likely see a much more dramatic rise in harmonic tremor and larger, more frequent, and shallower quakes if the eruption was about to start or was underway. But the best indicator of all, of course, is the webcam and visual observations. Until then, Iliamna rumbles away, keeping us all guessing.

My Beef With a Wired.com Article [Opinion piece]

Recently I happened upon an interesting article (or rant) on Wired.com's Eruptions blog, where the author, Erik Clemetti had challenged readers to describe or otherwise link the technology that would be required to successfully predict an imminent volcanic eruption. You can find my comments in the comments section of the article, but I was immediately like one of those kids who KNOWS the answer to the question in any school class raising his hand "Pick me! Pick me!".

Recently I started looking into what it would take to predict a volcanic eruption. I had seen several National Geographic specials about volcanic eruption prediction, and the pains to which some scientists have gone to make this sort of method or technology a reality. Erik seems to believe that A) No progress has been made and B) that it never will be... Allow me to retort!

First of all, there are some VERY interesting technologies out there to which he might be unaware. One such technology involves using muons (or more specifically, muon detectors). In a recent project undertaken by Japanese scientists, it was shown that placing muon detectors in a 360 degree pattern around a volcano, you can construct a complete 3D image of the volcanoes magma chamber. This technology works by calculating the number of muons flowing through a point in this 3D space to reach its destination. Muons thankfully are formed by the cosmos, so you need no machine, no projector, no generator to produce muons. They fly from all vectors and angles, and continue on uninterrupted until they collide with something (usually something VERY dense like lead, rock, etc). The absence of resistance from the muons travels (ie, the more muons that hit a certain detector at a certain angle) indicates a weak resistance force. This in turn indicates a magma chamber, or void space. This data is then used to create an actual 3D image of the magma chamber... and let me say, I would be skeptical too if I didn't see the tech work on TV. It is now being used to map the chambers of both Mt Shasta in California, and Mt Vesuvius in Sicily.

There are also other very good tell-tale signs that an eruption could be about to occur. Harmonic tremor and long-period events (one in the same really) indicate rising magma underneath the surface. While a recent article about Santorini on MSNBC pointed out that scientists say "90% of the time, magma intrusion does not lead to an eruption", persistent harmonic tremor has preceeded a great many powerful eruptions, most notably (and why harmonic tremor is now considered to be a precursor to an eruption) with a Columbian volcano (Galeras) that erupted, killing many including the volcanologists at the summit), even after the volcanologists had warned that an eruption was imminent. This eruption WAS predicted, and the prediction was ignored.

However, all volcanoes are different. What worked at Galeras does not say, work at Mt Shasta, nor could the same exact method be applied to a great number of volcanoes int he world. Plainly speaking, volcanic eruptions could only be predicted by using specific methods for specific volcanoes, until the day that we have such technology that can predict magma currents in the mantle to the lithosphere with as much accuracy that we do with weather.

Currently, we can tell a volcano is getting ready to erupt by many factors, such as increased harmonic tremor (undetectable without instrumentation most of the time), increased fumerolic or hydrothermal emission, increased SO2 and CO2 emission (indicative of de-gassing magma), deformation (measured via GPS) of the volcano, or frequent volcanic tremors. Couple this with a muon scanner that can tell you if magma is in fact in the chamber... well you have yourself a volcano eruption predicting machine, at least giving you a few days notice before an eruption (speculation, yes, but I imagine quite clearly that this would be one hell of a comprehensive system!).

But do NOT count out human innovation. Using muons to map internal geological structures is not a new idea., and the technologies required to make such a method to predict eruptions might already be available, but simply have not been tied together into the proper medley of technologies so that they are useful to us. If I had to take a wild swing as to when these technologies might be available and in use, I would guess probably 10-20 years from now. It is simply only a matter of time, and innovators are only limited by their imaginations and the materials available. I don't see that being a particular challenge this day and age when open-source collaboration is on an upswing. Just look at the private space travel industry!

In any case, it is my onion that not only can we, as humans, eventually predict eruptions, but the technology is already well underway to do so. So, to the author of Wired, I do appreciate scientific skepticism, but you might want to catch up on the stuff that is already being invented. You might say that scientists are keeping secrets, but I had no trouble in finding information BY SCIENTISTS to the contrary.

What do you think? Post your links to neat geological tech below and let the debate begin! You can see the links to the muon scanners (by the scientists who invented and tested them on volcanoes) below!

http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=19&resId=1&materialId=paper&confId=51276 (link to CERN labs explanation of MUONS)

http://www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/yaoki/2010JGR.pdf link to scientific paper by the tech's developers.

El Hierro Activity Still Apparent, Government Pretending It's Not There

The Spanish government at El Hierro is quickly trying to sweep the eruption under the rug. Even while Earthquake-report.com's Joke Volta continues to photograph clear evidence of underwater activity, underwater video showing degassing and small amounts of erupting lava, and even while seismographs continually record weak volcanic tremor, the government has insisted that the eruption is over. And to prove just how serious they are, they are lowing ALL alert levels, including near the eruption zone itself to "green".

This has a lot of people, especially the folks over there at Earthquake-report.com, scratching their heads as to why a government could actually be so careless. This whole eruption at El Hierro has been incredibly mismanaged by their tourism industry, and the government. Indeed the government has even stood in the way of actual scientific data on the eruption even being made public! Their stance has been one of fear, and thus far has crippled the economy of the small town of La Restinga, rather than helped it. From over cautious evacuations to cover ups, to the downright irresponsible LIFTING of the alert level, it seems the only people who know the truth were those that watched the web cams and hovered over the seismic data. And now the webcam is gone.

This has been a very odd volcano to report on, not because of its submarine eruption near a bustling tourist town, but because of the politicization of a volcanic eruption. It is a story that belongs in a bad volcano movie (Sorry Tommy Lee Jones!), not the real world.

Volcanic eruptions, when benign, and non-threatening as El Hierro is, typically should be a boon for communities and countries. Hawaii volcanoes national park in the US regularly draws tens to hundreds of thousands of visitors a year, all who want to see molten lava hit the ocean in giant explosions and witness the birth of new land. Iceland had an incredible surge in tourism when Eyjafjallajökull erupted in 2010. Italy's Etna volcano is famous worldwide for its frequent and spectacular paroxysms. And there are multiple volcanoes in South America such as Arenal, Poas, Tungurahua, and more that are regular draws for tourists and scientists alike...

So why did the El Hierro situation go the exact opposite way? First, the government tried to sweep it under the rug. Then it admitted something was going on, and it overreacted and evacuated large portions of the island, and also TOLD tourists not to show up. After that, they regularly butted heads with scientists, telling them what they could and could not make public about a geological event, sewing distrust. And if you are a regular reader of Earthquake-report.com and Joke Volta's adventures there, you'd know that she is now under pressure to "shut up" by the locals who are starting to blame her and Earthquake-report.com for the lack of tourists (or scaring them away) because of her efforts to document every day of the eruption (which is what GOOD volcanologists DO!).

This is kind of spooky. Why on earth would the Spanish government want to cover up an eruption that is CLEARLY ongoing? Its quite strange and disturbing to think that a government can be so incompetent in regards to a natural geological event. It could have gone so differently for the island of El Hierro and the town of la Restinga. They could have had thousands of sight seers, and busy cafe's, but the government instead scared everyone, and tried to un-do their mistake. Now it's simply a mess, and nobody is very happy about it. 

Island of Fogo Is Having Volcanic Tremor

The island of Fogo looks like something out of a sci fi fantasy movie. A massive island inlayed by a large caldera, with a spire-like volcanic cone in the center that looms high over the tropical landscape. Below the peak of Fogo (Pico do Fogo) lies a paved over, barren landscape, surprisingly home to houses and facilities built atop fresh lava flows. Fogo was one of the first volcanoes that fascinated me, given its striking appearance and remote location. To visit this volcano, for me, would be quite a sight.

Fogo is not a very well-known volcano, but it is capable of some serious eruptions. Indeed the original caldera forming event likely created tsunamis and landslides that would have hit the neighboring islands, and maybe even the African West Coast. The island itself is dotted with cinder cones young and old on its flanks, suggesting a very active life cycle as a volcano. Now, the volcano is getting seismic equipment installed on it, and already, results are coming in pointing to volcanic tremor, and small volcanic earthquakes. Fogo is waking up.  (or was it ever truly asleep?).

Fogo's last eruption occurred in 1995, when a small cinder cone was erupted on the WSW flank of the Fogo peak. This eruption started off as a fissure, and gradually built a cone, and produced slow moving pahoehoe lava flows that pooled at the base of the mountain.

Picture of the 1995 eruption of Fogo, from Smithsonian Global Volcanism Program website. Photo by Dick Moore, 1995 (U.S. Geological Survey)

The Smithsonian GVP Characterizes Fogo here:

"The massive 9-km-wide, horseshoe-shaped Cha caldera truncates the summit of Fogo stratovolcano, the most prominent in the Cape Verde islands. An ash plume (center) rises from the western flank of a steep-sided central cone, Pico, that rises more than 1 km above the caldera floor to form the 2829 m high point of the island. Pico, which is capped by a 500-m-wide, 150-m-deep summit crater, was apparently in almost continuous activity from the time of Portuguese settlement in 1500 AD until about 1760."

An eruption of Fogo today would likely be characterized by another small cinder cone building event, or possibly a larger more explosive event from the summit cone (which has not recently erupted historically speaking), which could be capable of strombolian type, or Hawaiian type eruptions. Flank eruptions on the West side of Fogo were considered to be Holocene, but most eruptions have occurred on the East side of the caldera rim recently. The West side of the island is heavily vegetated and is probably not at risk.

The Portuguese islands of the Cape Verde chain are all volcanoes, or have been volcanoes at one point in time or another (some are very old). Installation of more monitoring equipment is exciting news for some of us who long for a global volcanic monitoring network, and certainly for the scientists who will be poring over reams of seismic data. Every year, volcano monitoring gets better and better, and disasters and deaths are able to be more easily averted due to good early warning systems. It is my thought that within 10-20 years of today, we will actually be able to routinely scan a volcanoes magma reserves to determine whether an eruption is imminent, and when it might occur. The new muon-based mapping technology developed in Japan is a major step forward, and is currently being tested on volcanoes such as Vesuvius, and Fuji. 

If anything new develops on Fogo, you'll read about it here!