Sunday, August 26, 2012

Salton Sea Quake Activity Spikes With Large Swarm

A large earthquake swarm is occurring in the Salton Sea area just NW of Brawley, CA. The largest event so far has been a mag 5.4 tremblor which I personally felt at my home in San Diego. I am currently watching the action happen on the USGS site, and my real time Google Earth plugin. USGS reports the quakes at shallow depths of 13km (at the deepest) to <1km at the shallowest. The swarm has generated over 25 quakes at this time and is ongoing, with quakes actually getting more powerful at this time. Within one hour there were one 4.9, two 4.5 quakes, a 4.3, two quakes of 5.3 mag, plus many mag 1.0-3.9 quakes. Many smaller tremors are occurring.

*****UPDATE***** another 5.5 quake struck the same area.

The center of the activity is quite concentrated on the fault line that runs through Brawley and the Salton Sea (Salton Buttes) area. This area does have active geothermal prospecting, as well as a history of volcanic eruptions, although it has not occurred during historical time.

As these quakes are currently happening there is no data to suggest whether or not the quakes are purely tectonic, or possibly volcanic in nature. The area sees a large number of earthquakes each year, however this swarm is particularly intense for the region.

The region was shaken in 2010 by a large 7.4 magnitude earthquake centered near the Cerro Prieto volcano in Northern Mexico. The area has seen a rise in the number of very small quakes since then.

I will update this story as more info becomes available through USGS and other news media.

Below is a screen cap of the current state of the swarm, with the largest quake highlighted.



Here are some links form local news about the quakes, I will add these links as they become available.

****UPDATE****

In a statement form USGS, they stated:

“[The Brawley Seismic Zone] is a broad zone with lots of little faults,” explained Abbott.“This area has clearly activated. We will likely experience swarms of 3, 4 and 5-magnitude [earthquakes] but they are not likely to increase in intensity. Of course, there are no guarantees on this, but history says they likely won’t get bigger – that we will experience more of the same or smaller quakes,” he added.

Source: SoCal Rattled by Quake Swarms | NBC 7 San Diego

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Brawley-Earthquake-Felt-in-San-Diego-167483415.html
http://www.sandiego6.com/news/local/Series-of-Earthquakes-Felt-in-Imperial-Valley-167480795.html
http://news.lalate.com/2012/08/26/southern-california-earthquake-today-2012-strikes-brawley-east-of-san-diego/
http://www.cbs8.com/story/19379394/53-magnitude-earthquake-shakes-near-san-diego-county
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/26/us-quake-california-idUSBRE87P0C720120826
http://www.euronews.com/newswires/1636422-moderate-5-point-3-magnitude-earthquake-in-southern-california-usgs/
http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/4c38f0a1697a42f6bb9550843949e4c2/CA--SoCal-Quakes

http://earthquake-report.com/2012/08/26/powerful-earthquake-swarm-in-southern-california-mexico-border/ 

Here is the current list of quakes in the swarm (from USGS)

2.75km N of Brawley, California33.027°N115.532°W11.8
2.54km NW of Brawley, California33.005°N115.565°W12.4
3.86km N of Brawley, California33.038°N115.527°W12.4
3.64km SE of Westmorland, California33.005°N115.591°W14.3
3.66km W of Brawley, California32.973°N115.599°W8.5
2.92km NW of Brawley, California32.998°N115.549°W0.3
2.95km W of Brawley, California32.970°N115.588°W12.9
2.84km N of Brawley, California33.022°N115.536°W10.0
2.52km W of Brawley, California32.974°N115.561°W1.4
2.73km N of Brawley, California33.013°N115.536°W0.0
3.95km SSE of Westmorland, California32.986°N115.603°W11.8
4.37km NE of Brawley, California33.033°N115.479°W12.1
2.85km N of Brawley, California33.026°N115.524°W11.9
2.95km WSW of Brawley, California32.959°N115.585°W0.0
3.65km WNW of Brawley, California32.997°N115.587°W11.4
3.14km WSW of Brawley, California32.966°N115.577°W13.7
3.22km N of Brawley, California33.005°N115.534°W9.2
3.57km ENE of Brawley, California33.001°N115.457°W5.1
3.44km N of Brawley, California33.020°N115.523°W9.4
5.55km NNW of Brawley, California33.024°N115.549°W9.0
2.65km NNW of Brawley, California33.030°N115.545°W12.2
2.53km N of Brawley, California33.008°N115.529°W0.8
3.15km NNW of Brawley, California33.024°N115.543°W4.7
3.017km NNW of Seeley, California32.938°N115.775°W12.2
2.83km N of Brawley, California33.009°N115.528°W9.6
2.53km NW of Brawley, California33.004°N115.553°W12.0
2.53km NW of Brawley, California33.007°N115.553°W12.0
3.45km NNW of Brawley, California33.026°N115.543°W11.9
3.54km NW of Brawley, California33.012°N115.564°W12.7
2.55km N of Brawley, California33.029°N115.535°W10.0
3.05km WNW of Brawley, California32.996°N115.582°W12.5
2.63km NW of Brawley, California33.000°N115.561°W11.1
2.57km SW of Brawley, California32.928°N115.577°W7.9
2.98km SE of Brawley, California32.934°N115.457°W3.5
2.54km NW of Brawley, California33.008°N115.559°W9.6
3.65km N of Brawley, California33.025°N115.541°W13.6
2.83km NNW of Brawley, California33.010°N115.541°W9.8
3.44km SE of Westmorland, California33.007°N115.586°W12.8
2.85km NNW of Brawley, California33.021°N115.558°W24.8
2.54km WNW of Brawley, California32.989°N115.572°W12.4
3.24km WNW of Brawley, California32.993°N115.575°W0.2
3.34km N of Brawley, California33.018°N115.530°W9.1
4.35km SSE of Westmorland, California32.990°N115.598°W13.8
2.64km WNW of Brawley, California32.998°N115.572°W7.7
3.44km ENE of Brawley, California32.995°N115.485°W7.9
4.93km NW of Brawley, California32.998°N115.559°W3.1
5.34km NNW of Brawley, California33.019°N115.546°W12.3
2.66km N of Brawley, California33.035°N115.536°W10.2
3.45km NNW of Brawley, California33.023°N115.561°W13.7
3.45km NNW of Brawley, California33.021°N115.564°W12.5
3.53km NNW of Brawley, California33.003°N115.546°W11.0
4.64km NNW of Brawley, California33.019°N115.545°W13.1
4.05km NNW of Brawley, California33.026°N115.547°W13.8
2.55km NNW of Brawley, California33.024°N115.541°W13.4
2.55km NNW of Brawley, California33.027°N115.542°W13.3
3.05km N of Brawley, California33.027°N115.538°W14.5
3.15km NNW of Brawley, California33.024°N115.546°W13.5
2.64km NW of Brawley, California33.008°N115.560°W12.2
2.74km NW of Brawley, California33.014°N115.560°W12.7
2.64km NNW of Brawley, California33.011°N115.551°W12.0
2.64km NW of Brawley, California33.010°N115.556°W12.2
2.54km NNW of Brawley, California33.017°N115.556°W12.2
3.35km NNW of Brawley, California33.023°N115.549°W13.4
2.94km NNW of Brawley, California33.017°N115.555°W12.7
2.62km NW of Brawley, California32.996°N115.548°W6.0
3.85km NW of Brawley, California33.019°N115.563°W13.2
2.54km NNW of Brawley, California33.018°N115.555°W12.4
2.53km NW of Brawley, California32.998°N115.559°W11.4
2.53km NNW of Brawley, California33.010°N115.548°W12.0
2.54km NNW of Brawley, California33.015°N115.552°W12.5

*****UPDATE 8/27/12 *****

The Earthquake swarm has subsided. The majority of the quakes occurred yesterday, and slowed down to normal regional levels by late night/afternoon. Although some geologists were saying that the fault line had 'activated' and that there will probably be thousands of similar events in the coming weeks/months, I would suspect that the main events are over and we will see maybe 10-12 smaller quakes a day until even that activity subsides.

The quakes were activated by an intersection of fault lines at the base of the San Andreas fault. The area is rife with many relatively small fault lines. The last time the area was this active was in the 1970's, and before that in the 1930's. It's starting to make a pretty neat pattern of 40-year periods of quiescence, which is probably not significant in the grand scheme of things, but something worth noting nonetheless.

As it stands, the swarm had nearly 1,000 quakes, and over 400 of them were magnitude 2.5 or greater.

As I can say from firsthand experience, the shaking in San Diego was very light, almost not noticeable. The folks out there in Brawley had some minor damage to trailers, some structures, and some things were shaken off of shelves. By and large all damage was minimal, but many reports point to scared children who did not wish to go back in their houses for the night, and I am sure many residents were a bit spooked by the frequency of the quakes. one resident said they felt like they were popping off nearly every few minutes.

So far this morning, things appear to have calmed down quite considerably. The below picture shows all the quakes from yesterday's swarm.


***** UPDATE 8/28/2012 *****

After the quake swarm, scientists are weighing in on the causes. Most scientists say this is likely just a tectonic swarm, but Julie Dutton with USGS says "In volcanically active areas, earthquake swarms often indicate imminent eruptions, Dutton said. The only potential candidates for volcanic eruptions near Brawley are the Salton Buttes, five small lava domes that flank the Salton Sea and haven't erupted in close to 10,000 years." (From MSNBC.com).

While, yes, the area has not erupted in 10,000 years, it still remains geothermally active, and the area is used for geothermal energy. Chaiten volcano in Chile blew after over 10,000 years of silence, with no warning, so the possibility does always exist, however unlikely it might be. A real indicator of an imminent eruption however would be if the swarm is sustained, and the quakes grew shallower and shallower (indicating rising magma) which did not occur in this particular case.

The quakes ranged from some 13km below the surface to nearly at the surface, in a highly randomized fashion that does not seem to point to magma intrusion in the area, but like most rift-zone volcanoes, the process is highly unpredictable. More than likely the area will not see any volcanic activity for many decades to come.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Sotara Volcano In Columbia Stirs

Seismicity has been increasing in a long dormant volcano in Columbia. The Sotara Volcano on the Western Rim of Columbia has begun to exhibit signs of magma dike intrusion, as gas levels and earthquakes are increasing. This is somewhat unexpected as the volcano does not have a recent history of eruptions, and none in historical time, although it does display fumerolic and hot spring activity. Inflation has been occurring to the SE of the volcano according to Volcano-report.com.

Currently, due to the increase in seismicity, the alert level has been raised to "Yellow (III)" on a scale of 1-5. This does not mean an eruption is imminent from the volcano, however given its past quiescence, one could expect an increase in fumerolic/phreatic activity, and/or an eruption. The volcano is not a well known volcano, and has no historical record of any eruption. Evidence suggests that the volcano is capable of a wide variety of eruptive characteristics. The summit contains three irregular shaped calderas, and a summit dome, and there is evidence for pyroclastic flows in the past. The volcano is absolutely capable of minor phreatic eruption pyroclastic cone building events, and massive caldera forming collapses, however caldera formation is unlikely given its dormancy.

Columbia is currently experienceing a heightened state of activity regarding its volcanoes. Galeras, Nevado del Ruiz, Nevado del Huila, Cumbal, and now Sotara are all displaying heightened states of activity, with Galeras being the most disruptive of the bunch. None of course are life threatening if proper evacuation orders are followed, and Columbia, given the previous activity of Galeras, boasts a very well designed volcanic warning system.

While it is likely that the volcano may not erupt soon, any activity at long dormant volcanoes is taken with absolute seriousness by surrounding towns, and governments, and will be closely monitored. It is not unusual for volcanoes that have been dormant for long periods of time to suddenly spring to life, as has been evident in the recent eruptions of Redoubt in Alaska, Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland, Nabro in Eritrea, and others around the world. Even some supervolcanoes such as Uturuncu in Bolivia are displaying at least some renewed activity. This is to be expected given the geology of larger, more complex volcanoes, as they did not build their massive structures in days or years. It took eons, and eons to build some of our most revered mountains.

I will be following any developments regarding the Colombian volcanoes, as it seems, this is the place for a volcano geek to be! Check back here for updates!

Monday, August 20, 2012

El Hierro Reawakened? [Updated 10/15/2012]

It seems as of this hour that the El Hierro volcano might have sprung a new vent underwater off of the Las Calmas area of the island. Earthquake-report.com has an interesting picture of what appears to be a vent on their El Hierro running forum. They quote blogger Jon Frimann as saying that this could be related to dike intrusion, and that eruptions can and do take place without harmonic tremor. Jon is correct to state this, as many eruptions can and do happen with little warning.


Image from Earthquake-report.com of supposed El Hierro coastal activity.


The current photographs from El Hierro, the continuing seismicity, and the apparently new activity in regards to the above photo point to a renewed activity phase for the island, which had not erupted since the late 18th century. While it is still far too early to tell, it appears that the island is once again erupting.

The fact that the activity has been mostly constrained now to the outer flanks, and submarine depths, suggests that the age of the volcano, and the coolness of the solidified lava above it may be protecting the mainland from any activity so far. Indeed this would seem to correlate with the fact that the island has had much uplift, but little subsidence despite the previous eruption releasing lava underneath the sea on the Southern tip of the island. Think of it like a solid chunk floating on a block of jell-o. The island is uplifting because it is currently too dense to fracture and create above-water vents, but uplifts because the ground beneath is lubricated by water, and is from thinner crust.

As the lava bubble forms to the SW of the island, the island would be uplifted to the NE which is consistent with the current measurements.

It could very well be at this time that continued activity on El Hierro might be exclusively submarine. Hotspot volcanoes, much like Hawaii's Loihi mount, tend to follow the path of least resistance to the surface. It could be that, much like the big island of Hawaii, the activity has moved south, and a new Canary Island may be in the works. We will likely not see the result of this migration of lava columns in our life time, as Loihi will take some 10,000 years to break the surface of the ocean in any significant way. But it is still a very fascinating process to watch, which is why El Hierro gets such a good amount of press among bloggers.

El Hierro's webcams were turned off some time ago, so coverage on the eruption will almost exclusively come from Earthquake-report.com, INVOLCAN, and IGN. I will post more updates as they become available.

*****UPDATE*****

INVOLCAN has released a statement regarding the pictures taken from a helicopter flight over the quake area:

"“El PEVOLCA confirma que no se observan parámetros anómalos en la zona sobrevolada por el helicóptero del GES. Científicos del INVOLCAN, que portaban una cámara térmica, y del Instituto Geográfico Nacional no han observado parámetros anómalos en el vuelo de reconocimiento que han realizado esta mañana en el helicóptero del GES, en la zona en la que ayer se atisbó una mancha blanca en el mar y burbujeo. Con este vuelo queda definitivamente confirmado que no se han producido cambios significativos en el proceso magmático activo en la isla de El Hierro, aunque se mantiene el análisis de datos de forma continua.”"

Translation:

"PEVOLCA confirmed that no abnormal parameters observed in the area flown by helicopter from the GES. INVOLCAN scientists, carrying a thermal camera, and the National Geographic Institute have not observed abnormal parameters in the flight of recognition they have done this morning at the GES helicopter in the area in which peered yesterday a white spot on the sea and bubbling. With this flight has been finally confirmed that there were no significant changes in the active magmatic process in the island of El Hierro, while maintaining the data analysis continuously."

Seismic activity today has produced several quakes since early yesterday, but has since subsided with no new significant swarms. If anything further develops, an update will be posted. For now things have not changed much in the last couple of weeks.



*****UPDATE*****

It seems the hype this time over El Hierro might be a bit premature. While there has been a lot of earthquakes lately, all have been at or below a depth of 19km, which is far, far below the earth's surface. El Hierro may have some turbulence at a great depth, but is by no means near an imminent eruptive phase at this time. Seismicity will most likely continue for some time, but may or may not result in further activity.

The main concern is really, at this point, for the people of El Hierro, and as of now, the are in no danger. The quakes, while numerous, do not amount to much more than a stirring of magma currents deep below El Hierro, which is expected given the displacement of materials caused by the last eruption. This could be merely crustal adjustments, or something foreboding... at this time, nobody really has an answer.

It is clear now, that this is an active island volcano. What cant not possibly be clear is whether or not the recent activity is a precursor to more. My gut instinct says that El Hierro will experience more activity in the near future, but m gut instinct is not beholden to scientific scrutiny, and therefore cannot be relied upon. Only time will tell at this point, and for now, it appears that El Hierro might just be having some indigestion from its last bout of activity.

As of now, I am pretty m uch going to stop posting about El Hierro unless it becomes particularly active. It is useless to speculate on El Hierro, as it has consistently made fools of bloggers and scientists alike with its random behavior.

If anything new develops (of interest), I will cover it. If you happen to want to monitor the volcano yourself, please go to Earthqauke-report.com's continuing coverage page. This page will keep you up to date with the latest on the volcano, as they have a reporter (Joke Volta) on the premise, as well as a great information sharing agreement with INVOLCAN and PEVOLCA.

****UPDATE 7/5/2012****

It seems that PEVOLCA has been chastised by a member of the El Hierro Government, stating that they jumped the gun or made false statements harmful to tourism on the island. The issue was that PEVOLCA issued the above picture prematurely claiming that this was a new vent, when this had not been confirmed by scientists or bathymetry readings whatsoever. It becomes a cautionary tale for scientists not to get too excited when they think they see something that has not yet confirmed, and to instead follow due diligence in proving what you are claiming.

Today, nothing much has changed at El Hierro. The situation is about the same as it has been. There has been no new inflation, and the continuing earthquake swarm is in the same location and same depths as it was in the last few swarms. It is anyone's guess as to how this plays out. If the quakes become much shallower, there is a potential for the magma to reach the lava tube system of the 2011 eruption and possibly re-pressurize the shallower system. For now, the quakes are at a steady 20-18km in depth, on the NE part of El Hierro, and they have been at about the same magnitudes for the greater part of the day. No large quakes were felt today, but seismographs continue to record minimal harmonic tremor, and small, frequent quakes no bigger than 2.0.

*****UPDATE 7/7/2012*****

After a day or so of calm, with very little amounts of earthquake swarms in comparison to last few days, the quake swarms and uplift of El Hierro have resumed.   The below seismograph image details the currently (as of this writing) swarm, which has reached a little over half an hour in duration at this time now been sustained all throughout the end of the day. Many had thought the island would be calming down after some light subsidence of the islands deformation, but this new swarm may change that.



*****UPDATE 7/16/2012*****

The deformation and quake swarms at El Hierro seem to be subsiding. This can be chalked up to probable gas release as a result of decompression from the rising magma reservoir, and should continue gradually as the quake swarms and magma injection subside. This in no way means that the island will not have further swarms or injection in the future, although for now it appears the events are over.

The events of the past few weeks are similar to the events that preceded the eruption of "Bob" the underwater volcanic cone off the coast of La Restinga. Over 2,500 quakes have been recorded since the start of the swarm.

There was a lull in quake activity prior to the initial eruption, however seismic instruments and GPS measurements were not in place at the time, so the volcanologists that now know this is an active volcano are in data collection mode. Currently, here is a synopsis of what has occurred within the last month:

Quake swarms and vertical/NE deformation were observed. There has been no significant fluctuation in C02/S02 emissions from the erupting cone or on the island. Deformation reached a peak of approximately 10cm, and as of three days ago, began to subside with 1-2cm of negative inflation occurring. Injections of magma into the magma chamber are confirmed, however since the last avenue for magma to reach the surface has been blocked by cooling and water, this event has ended.

The end of the event likely indicates that the magma injected has reached a critical point and is rejecting new magma. This is probably because the current reservoir has no outlet, and thus is changing magma currents from the mantle by producing resistance and/or feedback due to the fact that the pressure in the chamber is too weak to breach the surface (crust) and generate an eruption at this time.

What this means is that El Hierro is again primed for eruption, however it may not end up in an eruption, rather it could simply cool into a 'crystal mush' over time and generate heightened microseismicity on the island for a long time, given that no crustal adjustments that allow magma to escape to the surface occur.

The future of El Hierro at this time is uncertain. I will be keeping a close eye on it, however until anything new develops, I will probably stop updating this post. Stay tuned for more volcano news!!

*****UPDATE 7/25/2012*****

After a relatively calm week, El Hierro Island is shaking again, and deformation is resuming (there have been several D/I [Deflation/Inflation] events within the last few days). There have been sketchy reports from residents about discoloration in the sea in the El Golfo bay area, however no scientific evidence yet suggests this is related to seismicity or quakes (algae blooms can have the same effect on water color).

The seismicity is remaining at the West tip of the island, mostly underneath a lighthouse at a depths of about 20km, however the new swarms include some stronger quakes, at depths of 3km or less (very shallow respectively) int he same region which leads to the question "Are these shallow quakes magma dike intrusion, or are they simply structural adjustments to the inflating magma chamber and other quakes?". Only time will tell in this case, as more data becomes available.

In any case, this has been a busy day on the island.

*****UPDATE 8/10/2012*****

Inflation is being confirmed by INVOLCAN and IGN, quoted as 'rapid'. This is normal behavior for an active volcano and does not mean that an eruption is imminent, although it does make it more likely. Currently quakes are ranging from 10km-8km below the surface of the island. Shallower quakes are suspected to be crustal adjustments to stress from below and are not considered to be directly volcanic in nature. However the magma chamber IS re-inflating, so it could be a matter of months or years for the volcano to resume its activity. It could also be that the chamber inflates, but does not erupt. Updates will be posted as they happen!


*****UPDATE 8/23/2012*****

The seismic swarm at El Hierro has calmed down, and numbers are looking more similar to the numbers of quakes that were occurring before the most recent swarm. It is confirmed that the last swarm was magma intrusion, with what consequence, nobody is certain. For now, vertical deformations are stable, with slight subsidence, but the amount of deformation that has occurred has left the island about 10cm taller than it started out as, so the injection was significant.

*****UPDATE 9/10/2012*****

Seismicity has increased according to IGN/INVOLCAN and Volcano-report.com. Quakes are occurring with more frequency and intensity, and the depth of the quakes has risen to approximately 10km. While this could be simple crust adjustments, it definitely looks more like magma is trying to rise again. D/I events continue to occur.

*****UPDATE 10/15/2012*****

Seismicity remains constant at El Hierro, and deformations are going up and down. What this means at this time is uncertain, but around 10-20 events a day are still being recorded at various centers within the volcano, at a depth of around 10-13km, which is a bit shallower than it was about two months ago when the depths were 15-20km. This could indicate that magma is slowly pushing its way to the surface, but as a lot of the government funded instruments and science teams have been shut down due to the Spanish budget crisis, I am relying solely on earthquake data and the folks who are still covering the story at Earthquake-report.com.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Two Shallow Quakes Hit Mammoth Mountain

Mammoth Mountain in California (located between Yosemite National Park, and Long Valley Caldera/Inyo Craters) is more commonly known locally as a ski/snowboarding resort, but few people actually realize it is a dormant, and potentially active volcano. Two shallow earthquakes, both less than 2km in depth, occurred near the summit of the restive giant. However, this does not indicate any impending eruption, although the quakes are likely tied to volcanic activity.


Map from USGS/CALVO detailing the locations of the most recent quakes at Mammoth.


Mammoth Mountain has not erupted in historical time. The last eruption was approximately 700 years ago, and occurred on the North side fo the mountain from vents that issued lava flows. The only other recorded activity since then, was a minor dike intrusion in 1989 that caused CO2 gas to be released at the SE foot of the mountain, killing a forest worker, and tree kill is apparent in the area to this day. The fact that the tress have not recovered, and CO2 gas is still present has prompted warning signs to be posted int he area since the incident, and the area remains off limits to people.

 Typically, there are a few quakes in the region yearly, but most of them are not near the summit as these two were, so it begs the question, is Mammoth Mountain slowly gearing up for a show?

An eruption at Mammoth Mountain might bode poorly for residents of California. Mammoth is a popular tourist attraction for skiers and snowboarders, is next to Yosemite National Park, and some evidence suggests a correlation between activity at Mammoth, and Long Valley Caldera (although Mammoth, even though it is situated on the NW rim of the Long Valley Caldera, is a chemically distinct magmatic system from Long Valley). An eruption today would likely be either phreatic (maar forming when ground water flashes to steam once it hits hot rock/magma), or an explosive cone forming eruption, much like its cinder cones to the south. However, Mammoth is a diverse volcano, having created lava domes, maars, and cinder cones, so any future activity could take many forms, however none are particularly life threatening if people are evacuated in advance of new activity.

The are has experienced a heightened level of seismicity (which includes Long Valley Caldera) since the mid-1970's. Causes of these quakes range from volcanic activity, to crustal adjustments (much like the recent quakes at Mauna Kea in Hawaii), or tectonic stress. In this case it is likely both a combination of crustal adjustment from the 1989 magma dike intrusion, and/or further injection of magma into the system are occurring. Magma dike intrusion does not always (and actually, not often at all) result in an eruption from a volcano. 90% of the time, the magma dike will cool slowly below ground, never breaching a seam or crack that would allow the lava to quickly decompress and erupt. So if this was actually dike intrusion, we might see more gas released like the 1989 event, or nothing at all.

CALVO is monitoring all volcanic systems in California and Nevada now, and have received new funding for furhter installation of scientific instruments on the most concerning volcanoes, including Mammoth Mountain. The project is not done yet, and monitoring on several of these volcanoes is done currently through the existing network. In the future, CALVO plans to install more detailed monitoring equipment that will measure gases, fumerole temperatures, harmonic tremor, and other factors that are currently unavailable for some volcanoes.